Multi-Institutional Registry for Prostate Cancer Radiosurgery: A Prospective Observational Clinical Trial
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE To report on the design, methodology, and early outcome results of a multi-institutional registry study of prostate cancer radiosurgery. METHODS The Registry for Prostate Cancer Radiosurgery (RPCR) was established in 2010 to further evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of prostate radiosurgery (SBRT) for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Men with prostate cancer were asked to voluntarily participate in the registry. Demographic, baseline medical, and treatment-related data were collected and stored electronically in a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant database, maintained by Advertek, Inc. Enrolled men were asked to complete short, multiple choice questionnaires regarding their bowel, bladder, and sexual function. Patient-reported outcome forms were collected at baseline and at regular intervals (every 3-6 months) following treatment. Serial prostate-specific antigen measurements were obtained at each visit and included in the collected data. RESULTS From July 2010 to July 2013, nearly 2000 men from 45 participating sites were enrolled in the registry. The majority (86%) received radiosurgery as monotherapy. At 2 years follow-up, biochemical disease-free survival was 92%. No Grade 3 late urinary toxicity was reported. One patient developed Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity (rectal bleeding). Erectile function was preserved in 80% of men <70 years old. Overall compliance with data entry was 64%. CONCLUSION Stereotactic radiosurgery is an alternative option to conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer. The RPCR represents the collective experience of multiple institutions, including community-based cancer centers, with outcome results in keeping with published, prospective trials of prostate SBRT.
منابع مشابه
Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy in low-risk prostate adenocarcinoma: preliminary results of a multi-institutional phase 1 feasibility trial.
BACKGROUND Recent reports using extreme hypofractionated regimens in the treatment of low-risk prostate adenocarcinoma have been encouraging. Here, the authors report on their own multi-institutional experience with extreme hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for early stage disease. METHODS In total, at 4 centers, 45 patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network-defined, low-ris...
متن کاملLocalised prostate cancer treated with MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation: phase I trial results
Purpose Purpose of this prospective, multi-institutional Phase I clinical study was to investigate whether MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (MR-TULSA), a novel minimally-invasive technology to treat organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa), is safe, feasible and effective. It employs directional plane-wave high-intensity ultrasound, which ablates prostate tissue using real-time thermome...
متن کاملLong‐term outcomes of proton therapy for prostate cancer in Japan: a multi‐institutional survey of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
This is the first multi-institutional retrospective survey of the long-term outcomes of proton therapy (PT) for prostate cancer in Japan. This retrospective analysis comprised prostate cancer patients treated with PT at seven centers between January 2008 and December 2011 and was approved by each Institutional Review Board. The NCCN classification was used. Biochemical relapse was based on the ...
متن کاملPSA Screening in Prostate Cancer
Introduction: Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in Iranian men. PSA(prostate specific antigen) screening is a controversial issue because PSA screening leads to diagnose of patients with low risk prostate cancer who not only do not benefit from treatment but also suffer from complication caused by treatment. On the other hand, without prostate cancer screening, the rate of meta...
متن کاملA successful clinical pilot registry of four radiation oncology practices in Africa and Ontario.
OBJECTIVE Radiation Oncology practices can exhibit heterogeneities between and sometimes within institutions. Clinical registries with scope and detail could quantify consistency and distinctives that justify difference. Retrospective, isolated clinical audits are problematic, typically because not all data are captured in charts, while useful prospective clinical registries will have to be pra...
متن کامل